Crimea: The Anatomy of Crisis Transitions Online

The annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 marked a turning point in post-Soviet history and international relations. The crisis highlighted tensions between Russia and Ukraine, as well as the wider implications for regional and global security. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the Crimean crisis, exploring its historical, political, and economic dimensions, as well as its impact on regional and global security.

Historical Background

The Crimean Peninsula has a complex and contested history. It was part of the Russian Empire from 1783 to 1954, when it was transferred to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic within the Soviet Union. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Crimea became part of independent Ukraine. However, the region remained predominantly Russian-speaking, and there was a growing sense of separatism among the Crimean population.

Crimea: The Anatomy of a Crisis (Transitions Online Series Book 7)

by Christine Feehan

4 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	728 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	150 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

Political Developments

In 2014, political tensions in Ukraine erupted following the Euromaidan Revolution, which ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych. Russia responded by annexing Crimea, citing concerns about the safety of ethnic Russians in the region. The annexation was widely condemned by the international community, which imposed sanctions on Russia.

Economic Impact

The annexation of Crimea had a significant economic impact on both Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine lost a valuable source of tourism revenue and access to key industrial assets. Russia, on the other hand, gained a strategic military foothold and control over the natural resources in the Black Sea region.

Regional and Global Security

The Crimean crisis has had a profound impact on regional and global security. It has led to a deterioration in relations between Russia and Ukraine, as well as heightened tensions between Russia and the West. The annexation of Crimea also raised concerns about the future of the Minsk agreements, which were aimed at ending the conflict in eastern Ukraine.

Online Media Coverage

The Crimean crisis was extensively covered by online media outlets. Social media platforms played a significant role in shaping public opinion and disseminating information about the conflict. However, there was also a significant amount of misinformation and propaganda circulating online, which made it difficult for users to access accurate and reliable information.

Analysis of Online Media Coverage

A study of online media coverage of the Crimean crisis found that there were significant differences in the way that the conflict was framed by different outlets. Western media outlets tended to focus on the Russian invasion and annexation of Crimea, while Russian media outlets presented a more positive view of Russia's actions. There was also a significant amount of misinformation and propaganda circulating online, which made it difficult for users to access accurate and reliable information.

The Crimean crisis was a major turning point in post-Soviet history and international relations. It highlighted tensions between Russia and Ukraine, as well as the wider implications for regional and global security. The crisis also raised important questions about the role of online media in shaping public opinion and disseminating information during times of conflict.

References

[1] "The Annexation of Crimea: A Case Study in Russian Information Warfare." RAND Corporation, 2016. [2] "The Crimean Crisis and Online Media: A Comparative Analysis of Coverage in Western and Russian Media." Journal of International Communication, 2017. [3] "The Impact of the Crimean Crisis on Regional and Global Security." International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2015.